What the reported figures establish
According to Social Samosa and exchange4media, both summarising TAM AdEx data, digital ad impressions in India rose 44% in January–July 2026 versus the same months in 2025. Adobe Software India accounted for 4% of the reported advertiser impressions, ahead of Flipkart.com and OpenAI at 3% each. These are shares of impressions delivered, not shares of spending, people reached, or sales.
That distinction changes the headline. Adobe led this measurement of ad delivery. Neither trade report shows the creative it used, its media cost, whether the same people saw multiple ads, or what happened after exposure. Calling the ranking a successful campaign would go beyond the evidence.
A leader in a distributed market
Adding the rounded shares reported for Adobe, Flipkart.com, OpenAI, Amazon Online India and Reliance Retail gives approximately 14% of impressions for those five named advertisers. That is our arithmetic on the published percentages, not a separate TAM AdEx finding. Rounding and the report's measurement scope limit precision.
The practical reading is that the largest named advertiser still represented a small slice of measured delivery. A marketer cannot infer from this table that one brand dominated audience attention, or that a smaller buyer had no room to compete. A category-specific audience and a clear message may matter more than a national rank; that is a strategic hypothesis, not an outcome demonstrated by the data.
Buying method is not campaign performance
The reports put display at 91% of measured digital impressions and programmatic transactions at 96%. These are market-wide breakdowns. They do not describe Adobe's own creative mix or buying method, and they do not establish that display or programmatic worked better for any advertiser.
Impression growth can reflect more placements, more campaigns, repeated exposure, or changes in the measured inventory. To assess effectiveness, a brand would need a defined objective and additional measures such as unique reach, frequency, cost, qualified response and sales or retention where relevant. None of those Adobe-specific results appears in the cited reports.
A measurement brief for a smaller team
Before a launch, write down the action the campaign should change: relevant visits, trial starts, qualified leads or repeat purchases. Record impressions to understand delivery, then check reach and frequency to see how widely and how often the message was shown. Compare those with cost and the chosen business outcome.
This prevents a common reporting mistake: treating a large impression count as evidence that an idea persuaded people. The TAM AdEx figures are useful market context. They are not a substitute for a campaign's own measurement plan.
Set a campaign objective before buying reach. Track impressions alongside reach, frequency, cost and the business action you want; a high delivery count alone cannot establish effectiveness.
Sources & notes
These links document reported facts and original material where available. Strategic interpretation is mkrting.com's own.
- Trade reportingSocial Samosa report on TAM AdEx digital ad impressions, January–July 2026 ↗
- Trade reportingexchange4media report on the same TAM AdEx dataset ↗
This analysis uses two trade reports summarising the same TAM AdEx dataset. We did not review the underlying TAM report or Adobe's campaign data. The approximate 14% total is our arithmetic on rounded reported shares; strategic recommendations are our interpretation.
Editorial note: Expanded on 24 September 2026 to explain the measurement limits, add a second report and distinguish reported facts from interpretation.
Found an error? Read our corrections policy.